The output of the square footing calculator looks like the following: The updated stemwall calculator and the square footing calculator: EnerCalc KootK (Structural) 25 Dec 14 18:04 in brackets next to the transverse reinforcement: (unnecessary).Īnyhow, feedback or comments on these two tools would be helpful.Ī confused student is a good student. Okay, another observation, in the print preview screen of the StruCalc app. Most continuous footings for single story residences that I see are typically 12" wide and 6" deep with (2) #4 bars horizontal cont. Typically I've seen 1 to 3 longitudinal #4 bars. In residential construction I have never seen this done except for point loaded square footings. #4 bars placed transverse to the stemwall. I am liking StruCalc's very simple interface however the one thing I am noticing with StruCalc for a continuous footing (when reinforcement is enabled) the callout for a min. Has anyone had experience with either of these software products in this capacity? I've recently been testing software for the design of residential and light commercial square and continuous footings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |